Skip to content
Wednesday, September 23, 2026 Buying & trading early MMA cards — send your list
MMA cards. History. Market.
Fightcardboard The MMA Card Archive
Catalogue No. 793 · Card record

Rashad Evans

2009 Topps UFC Round 2 · card #44

Key card
  • FighterRashad Evans
  • Year2009
  • ManufacturerTopps
  • Set2009 Topps UFC Round 2
  • Card number#44
  • TypeBase card
  • AutographNo
  • Serial numberedNo
  • Rookie statusNot a rookie card. RC-flagged on the Trading Card Database checklist that the archive's Round 2 set record follows; SportsCardsPro records it as not a rookie card. It is the later of his two 2009 base cards.
  • Print runUnknown — not estimated
01

Why this card matters

His first solo base card in a UFC-licensed set, from the portrait half of the Round 2 checklist — the same 150-card set whose #101 holds the Jon Jones rookie. The Ruby /8 and Diamond 1/1 parallels are the scarce end, and this is the Evans card most often mislabelled as his rookie.

02

Identification

Missing a front scan. Contribute one.

  • Portrait card, number 44, in the first 100 of the Round 2 checklist.
  • Round 2's /188 parallel is called Silver by some checklists and Onyx by sellers — the same card.
03

Parallels

Base
This card
Gold
Probable
Onyx
/188
Probable
Ruby
/8
Probable
Diamond
1/1
Probable

Parallel identification guide

04

Population & market

Population. Population figures will be taken directly from the grading companies and dated when they are. None are shown yet.

FightCardboard doesn't republish other sites' price data, and won't label an asking price as a value. What appears here instead: sales we made or watched happen, and public auction results — each tagged with its source.

Jeff Allender's House of Checklists (nslists.com) — 2009 Topps UFC Round 2 checklist
SportsCardsPro — Rashad Evans #44 — 2009 Topps UFC Round 2

05

Available copies

None in the vault right now.

Tell me when one landsOffer one to us

06

More Rashad Evans

Sources & research Verified×1

Every factual claim on this page, the evidence behind it, and an honest confidence level. Where sources disagree the disagreement is kept, not quietly resolved.