Skip to content
Friday, October 2, 2026 Buying & trading early MMA cards — send your list
MMA cards. History. Market.
Fightcardboard The MMA Card Archive
2013 Topps UFC Bloodlines #104 Ronda Rousey — front
#104
Catalogue No. 197 · Card record

Ronda Rousey

2013 Topps UFC Bloodlines · card #104

Key card
  • FighterRonda Rousey
  • Year2013
  • ManufacturerTopps
  • Set2013 Topps UFC Bloodlines
  • Card number#104
  • TypeBase card
  • AutographNo
  • Serial numberedNo
  • Rookie statusNot a rookie card
  • Print runUnknown — not estimated
01

Why this card matters

Her first Bloodlines base card as UFC champion, with the UFC logo replacing the Strikeforce branding on #150. It comes from the same set as Conor McGregor's #139 rookie card.

02

Identification

Missing a back scan. Contribute one.

  • Card #104
  • UFC logo top right
  • Cracked-stone background, armbar photo
  • Nameplate RONDA ROUSEY / UNITED STATES
03

Parallels

Base
—
This card
Platinum
1/1
High confidence
Printing Plates
1/1
High confidence
Red
/8
High confidence
Flag
—
Probable
Black
—
Probable
04

Population & market

Population figures will be taken directly from the grading companies and dated when they are. None are shown yet.

FightCardboard doesn't republish other sites' price data, and won't label an asking price as a value. What appears here instead: sales we made or watched happen, and public auction results — each tagged with its source.

Trading Card Database — 2013 Topps UFC Bloodlines #104 Ronda Rousey
SportsCardsPro — Ronda Rousey #104 — 2013 Topps UFC Bloodlines

FightCardboard verified sales

No FightCardboard verified sales recorded yet.

A verified sale is a transaction we completed or watched happen. Until there is one, there is nothing here to cite.

05

Available copies

Nothing from the archive is currently available.

This card record stands on its own whether or not a copy is in the vault.

Tell me when one landsOffer one to us

06

Further reading

07

More Ronda Rousey

Sources & research Verified×1

Every factual claim on this page, the evidence behind it, and an honest confidence level. Where sources disagree the disagreement is kept, not quietly resolved.